Kling 4
The flagship- Directed camera work that follows the brief
- Image-to-video with an anchored start frame
- Stronger subject consistency across takes
- The pick for finals and client deliverables
Kling 4: Better Video, Clearer Stories
Direct cinematic AI video from a text brief or a still frame — camera moves, motion, and sound composed by the model — then refine with references and settings.
Verdict
The short answer
Both models take a text brief and return a clip. What differs is the generation: Kling 4 is tuned for directed camera work and consistency; Kling 3.0 is the fast everyday tier.
Kling 3.0
The fast tier- Quick drafts for exploring directions
- The cheaper loop for comparing ideas
- Simple prompt-in, clip-out workflow
- The right default for rapid ideation
Explore on Kling 3.0, finish on Kling 4. The same prompt carries over between engines, so the split workflow costs you nothing.
Specs
Spec sheet, side by side
Pulled from the live model catalog — what you see is what the studio actually submits.
 Kling 4 | Kling 3.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Positioning | Flagship — direction and consistency | Everyday tier — fast drafts |
| Resolutions | ||
| Aspect ratios | ||
| Max reference images | Up to 4 | Up to 0 |
| Modes | Text to video · Image to video | Text to video |
| Take lengths | 5s · 10s | 5s |
| Credit cost | a partir de 20 créditos | a partir de 20 créditos |
| Typical pick | Finals, product films, directed shots | Drafts, variants, idea loops |
Modelo de IA 20 créditos
Prompt0/2000
Evite personagens, logotipos e músicas protegidos por direitos autorais, bem como conteúdo sensível ou explícito — pode ser bloqueado.
Duração · 5s
Áudio
Geração em lote1
Custo estimado: 20 créditos
Sua criação aparece aqui
Escolha um modelo, descreva a cena e clique em Gerar.
Test it yourself
The same-prompt test bench
Every test below loads an identical prompt into the studio. Run it on Kling 4, switch the model to Kling 3.0, run it again — the difference is yours to judge.
Tip: keep the take at 5s for the A/B pass, then re-run the winner at 10s.
Camera control
CameraA matte ceramic pour-over coffee set on a walnut table — slow orbit around the subject, morning window light, steam rising, product cinematography.
What to compare: Whether the orbit stays smooth and the subject stays centered through the move.
Motion & physics
ActionA surfer carving across a glassy wave at golden hour — tracking shot from the side, spray catching the light, warm tones.
What to compare: Cloth, water, and particles — do they move with weight, or smear between frames.
Faces in motion
PortraitPortrait of an elderly fisherman with a weathered face — slow push-in, overcast harbor light, wind in his jacket, documentary feel.
What to compare: Skin texture and expression stability while the camera pushes in.
Scene density
SceneA cozy ramen shop at night — lanterns swaying, steam rising from bowls, rain streaking the window, a cat shifting on a stool, held wide shot.
What to compare: How many moving elements stay coherent before the frame starts to smear.
Deep dive
An honest breakdown of Kling 4 vs Kling 3.0
Comparison articles love declaring a winner. These two models are not really competitors — they are two rungs of the same ladder, and the useful question is which rung a given shot belongs on. Here is what actually differs once you run the same brief through both.
Same family, different tuning
Kling 4 and Kling 3.0 share the studio: the same prompt box, the same wallet, the same credit estimate previewed before every run. Where they diverge is tuning. Kling 4 is optimized for direction — camera moves that land where you asked, subjects that stay consistent, and an image-to-video path that anchors a still as the first frame.
Kling 3.0 trades that control for turnaround. It takes a prompt and returns a clip fast, which makes it the cheaper loop for exploring ideas before you commit to a direction.
Where the difference actually shows
On simple held shots the two engines are closer than marketing suggests — a static product on a table looks good on either. The gap opens when the shot asks for something: a camera orbit, a face in motion, a scene with several moving elements. That is where directed control and consistency pay for themselves.
A practical reading of the results: if the Kling 3.0 draft already cuts, you are done. If the take is headed for a hero slot or a client deck, re-run the same prompt on Kling 4 and compare.
The two-model workflow
The cheapest way to use both engines is to treat them as stages, not rivals. Explore on Kling 3.0: vary the prompt, test camera moves, and run two or three candidate directions. Once a direction wins, re-run the identical prompt on Kling 4 for the final take. Because both models live in one studio and share the same wallet, nothing about the brief needs to change.
The same applies to image-to-video. Rough in the idea from a text prompt, then hand the winning still to Kling 4’s image-to-video for a controlled final pass.
Credits and cost control
Every generation in the studio shows its credit estimate before you run, and the estimate updates as you switch models — the spec table above reads live values from the same catalog. Failed generations refund their credits automatically, so an A/B test only ever costs the successful renders.
For most users the pattern that keeps spend low is simple: draft at 5s on Kling 3.0, and reserve Kling 4 takes for shots that have already earned their prompt.
FAQ
Kling 4 vs Kling 3.0 FAQ
Understand the model, prepare better references, and choose a practical approach to your next clip.
01Is Kling 4 or Kling 3.0 better?
Neither is strictly better — they are tuned for different stages. Kling 3.0 wins on speed and iteration cost for drafts; Kling 4 wins on direction, consistency, and image-to-video for final takes.
02Does Kling 3.0 support image-to-video?
No — Kling 3.0 is text-to-video only in this studio. Image-to-video runs on Kling 4.
03Is Kling 4 more expensive?
It costs more credits per take — the exact estimate for your settings is shown in the studio before every run. The spec table on this page reads the live catalog values.
04Can I run the same prompt on both models?
Yes — that is the point of the test bench above. Each case loads an identical prompt; run it on 3.0, switch the model selector to Kling 4, and run it again to compare.
05Which should I use for a client deliverable?
Kling 4 — its direction and consistency advantage is most visible when a clip is watched closely or cut into paid work.
06Do my credits work on both models?
Yes. Credits are shared across every model in the studio — the same wallet pays for drafts on 3.0 and finals on Kling 4.
Make the next idea move
Start your next shot on Kling 4
Bring a start frame, a character, or a clear scene brief. Explore a take, refine the move, and save a clip that fits your edit.